In this conversation, I talk with Kyle about when evidence is and isn't required. How do we know when a knowledge claim requires objective verification? Does Kyle require evidence for his belief in God? If not, why not? How do we consistently apply our standards of evidence for the various claims we have? Follow me on Facebook: / raulstreetknowledge Give me your feedback. I am always learning new and better ways to explore people's methods for arriving at truth, so is there anything you would have done different? Any thing I should keep in mind for future interviews? Where else would you have taken the conversation?