Audi A4 Avant 3.0 TDI – A disappointing used car purchase? | Redhead

Join us for an engine check on a dream car we bought a few months ago: a 2015 Audi A4 B8 3.0 TDI with 245 hp, engine code CKVC, and over 150,000 km on the clock. We at Redhead are familiar with these very beautiful and pleasant-driving Avants, which certainly have high mileage if they are cared for and used appropriately. They all have their quirks, more or less. Some more, some less. But if these very weaknesses are provoked in any way, e.g., by using them as a company car without reference to their value and intended purpose, a beautiful horse can fall into poor health. Because of a lack of nutrition, use, care, and respect for value. Even with good genes, a car can then crash and burn. We're not sure what to expect here. A very nice owner took the car on as her dream car from a dealer. The paperwork and maintenance reports seem conclusive. The overall condition and equipment actually make a good impression. Simple standard tests like those offered by ADAC and others would remain inconspicuous. The error log doesn't suggest anything malicious here either. However, if you look beneath the camouflage, the proper tests may reveal weaknesses that make Audi's standard check appear "fine." Therefore, you have to take your time and look behind the scenes. Then you often get completely different impressions and can actually see into the past or future without completely dismantling the engine. Would you like to have such perspectives for politicians? Just study the biographies and deeds of people and their goals 10 years back! People are certainly capable of putting on a good show over short distances. Usually, they fall back into their old routine sooner or later. Every refacing engineer knows that attempts to cheat are not uncommon when recording time-based work steps. But with a trained eye and time to observe, it becomes clear what's really going on. It's similar with our engine check. You have to take the time to observe. If the Berlin election shows that after just one year, the electorate is indicating that things aren't okay "as they are," and the electoral situation is changing, yet the factions are once again joining forces in such a way that they retain power but achieve nothing, then this is a testament to the nature of politics. Disenchantment with politics is clearly setting in. People feel disenfranchised and powerless. It is precisely this ignorance of Ms. Jarasch's that is weakening faith in democracy and providing the breeding ground for opponents of democracy. Is the divided red-red-green faction, with Ms. Jarasch and Giffey, an alliance? Quoting the Tagesspiegel, it states: Parts of the SPD and Green Party lead candidate Bettina Jarasch agree that they want to continue with the three-party alliance despite the losses. The arguments: the majority is there, the city leans left, and the overlaps in terms of content are greatest. Ms. Jarasch even wants to bypass the good practice of letting the election winner negotiate first and talk to the SPD and the Left Party as quickly as possible. This demonstrates a clear political stance, but a lack of direction. No, this election was not a mandate for government. It was a protest vote, an act of desperation – against this coalition and its dispute. 50 percent of CDU voters voted for the party because they reject the others, not because they think the CDU is so great. Decency therefore demands that, especially after a repeat election, other options be seriously explored. END QUOTE! Maintaining power at all costs, despite which everything is simmering internally and there is no consensus at all. And look nationwide, for example, at the reported success of the "refugee summit"(?) under Ms. Faeser. Only frustration is spreading. If the federal government signals that no more money can be expected to help the states and, subsequently, the municipalities, that's one thing, but to sell the unsuccessful summit as a "communications success" when it becomes clear that municipalities are collapsing at the grassroots level is a bad joke. Brilliant and seductively soporific. We need skilled immigration and young workers. But the one has nothing in common with the other! Our kindergarten places cost up to €800! Which German can afford children? Having their own children? None under these laws. But the shortage of skilled workers and an aging workforce, and the goal of reducing Germany's largest economic engine to a minimum, are the consequences of policy. Yet total mobility in EUROPE accounts for 0.9% of global emissions! No crowbar. But we pretend. BACK: Fewer refugees arrived in 2015 than today, so state aid and organization are still needed! So please, no empty words, Ms. Faeser! Greetings to the world L. Schumann --- SHOP https://expertdrive.de