Richard Dawkins v. Science - The Bombardier Beetle

FOR THE READERS: Check out this short link: http://www.answersingenesis.org/artic... Creationist clips from "Amazing Creatures That Defy Evolution, Vol.1." I realize my videos on the doctrine of Evolution are more light-hearted than most. But I must confess, I have a hard time discussing the validity of Victorian age myths with much seriousness while viewing things from the perspective of the incredible technological and scientific adavancements of the past 150 years which has shown this faith-based belief system to be as relative to the discussion on origins as Latin is to the common man. It is a theory logically IMPOSSIBLE (Something from Nothing, aka cosmic origins), DOA (dead on arrival, due to the problem of abiogenesis, aka Life from Non-life), and debunked by the very historical science it claims to be built on: Radiometric dates being derived from the hugely suppositional idea of uniformitarianism; fossil fragments of ancient apes (often curiously missing their tell-tale hands and feet from the ankles and wrists down) being INTERPRETED as hominid; ancient antedilluvian man, aka Neanderthal, and post-dilluvian man, aka Cro-Magnon, being portrayed as something besides that which is FULLY human; the sudden appearance of every major branch of phyla appearing in the so-called Cambrian Explosion, FULLY-FORMED; petrified trees CONNECTING three or more layers of the geological column, planets that spin "backwards" (violating evolutionary theory on star formation and the Big Bang itself), etc. and so forth, to name but a few.