From CJI Gavai's clarification to Surya Kant's ideals - the judiciary faces a new crisis! | Newsn...

As CJI B.R. Gavai's tenure draws to a close, the country is witnessing for the first time the head of the Supreme Court himself striving to prove his neutrality—from declining government positions to repeatedly swearing impartiality. He even repeatedly raised the shield of bulldozer judgments to avoid being convicted in the "court" of social media. While the new CJI Surya Kant's statement—"One should only be concerned with judgment, not image"—sounds ideal, the reality of the country is that every judge is now more concerned with their image than their judgments. The clarifications from Gogoi, Chandrachud, and now Gavai—all suggest that the real crisis facing the judiciary is not law, but narrative. Today, court decisions are being written on social media before they reach the courtroom—and this is the most dangerous turning point in India's judicial system. CJI Gavai, Justice Surya Kant, Supreme Court India, judiciary image crisis, judicial neutrality debate, social media narrative, bulldozer judgment, Ranjan Gogoi controversy, DY Chandrachud criticism, judicial reputation, Indian judiciary pressure, CJI transition, justice system analysis, NewsNasha report #CJIGavai, #JusticeSuryaKant, #SupremeCourtIndia, #JudicialCrisis, #ImageVsJudgment, #IndianJudiciary, #BreakingAnalysis, #SocialMediaImpact, #JudicialIndependence, #NewsNasha