Article 32 & 226 | 5 Writs Indian Constitution Explained | Constitutional Remedies
Article 32 of the Indian Constitution guarantees the Right to Constitutional Remedies supreme court can issue 5 writs Habeas Corpus Mandamus Prohibition Certiorari Quo Warranto Article 32 of the Indian Constitution guarantees the Right to Constitutional Remedies and allows every citizen to directly approach the Supreme Court of India when a Fundamental Right is violated. No permission, no middleman — straight to the Supreme Court. In this video, we explain Article 32 in a clear and exam-oriented manner, exactly how it is asked in Judiciary, UPSC, and law school exams. Dr. B.R. Ambedkar famously called Article 32 the “Heart and Soul of the Indian Constitution” because without remedies, Fundamental Rights would be meaningless. Important Links Telegram Channel (Notes & PDFs): https://t.me/legalclarity Easement:- • Easement With Case Laws Explained | Transf... Lease:- • Lease Transfer Of Property Act Explained |... Article 14:- • Article 14 Fundamental Right Indian Consti... Murder and Culpable Homicide:- • Culpable Homicide And Murder Under BNS Exp... dying declaration:- • Dying Declaration BSA 2023 Explained | Sec... Instagram Page (Legal Reels & Updates): / legalclarity2 🌐 Website / Blog (Optional): https://www.lcaqeel.in This lecture covers: • Meaning and scope of Article 32 • Why Article 32 itself is a Fundamental Right • Supreme Court’s constitutional duty under Article 32 • Latin maxim: Ubi Jus Ibi Remedium (where there is a right, there is a remedy) • Powers of the Supreme Court to issue directions, orders, and writs • Whether Article 32 can be suspended • Relationship between Article 32 and Article 226 🔹 Five Writs Explained in Detail: 1. Habeas Corpus – protection against illegal detention (with example and case law) 2. Mandamus – compelling public authorities to perform legal duties 3. Prohibition – preventing courts/tribunals from exceeding jurisdiction 4. Certiorari – quashing illegal or jurisdiction-less orders 5. Quo Warranto – challenging illegal appointments to public offices 🔹 Important Case Laws Discussed: • Sunil Batra v. Delhi Administration • Praga Tools Corporation v. C.A. Imanual • University of Mysore v. C.D. Govinda Rao 🔹 Article 32 vs Article 226: This video clearly explains why Article 226 does NOT override Article 32 and why the Supreme Court remains the ultimate guardian of Fundamental Rights. This video is highly useful for: ✔ Law students ✔ Judiciary & UPSC aspirants ✔ Constitution of India learners ✔ Anyone preparing for competitive exams 📌 Watch till the end to understand why Article 32 is the backbone of Fundamental Rights in India. 👍 If this video helped you, LIKE the video, SUBSCRIBE to the channel, and COMMENT which writ you want a separate detailed video on. Article 32 Indian Constitution, Article 32 explained, Article 32 Supreme Court, Right to Constitutional Remedies, Article 32 law, Article 32 for judiciary exam, Article 32 UPSC, Article 32 LLB, Article 32 case laws, Article 32 landmark cases, Writ jurisdiction Article 32, Types of writs Article 32, Habeas Corpus Article 32, Mandamus Article 32, Difference between Article 32 and 226, Dr BR Ambedkar Article 32, Heart and soul of constitution, Fundamental Rights enforcement, Indian Constitution explained, Law students India 📝 Disclaimer This content is strictly for educational purposes only and based on academic sources. Not legal advice. For professional help, consult a qualified advocate.
