KINGWELLE crank CHECK | vespa | FMP-Solid PASSion |

looks good. Its a 61mm longstroke crankshaft for vespa px 200 from 2016. is it worth the high price? it costs three times more than a normal standard mazzucchelli rotary crank ie. is the king-crank three times better? note: it was a 2016 version, one of the first ones. things defo improved. esp for reed valve, kingwelle nowadays is the very first choice! 👌🍻 test results back then 1) stumps were not 100% straight (centering) 2) one side/cheek had low press fit = cheek was twistable 3) balancing rate ok, but only average, even tough it looks well balanced with full circle optic and heavy metal inserts... 4) cheek is not flowed, its more edgy than an original piaggio tested two. both the same results. 2016 conclusion: due to twistable cheecks not recommended back then. mazzucchelli cranks perform better. static balancing rates longstroke with malossi 210 piston: polini 53, tameni 48, mazzu 47, bgm 47, piaggio 45, kingwelle 42% u should have seen the eyes of the proud owner of this crank - cause what is expensive is good - when the cheek twisted so easily. he got very quiet, i centered it again and we switched the topic ;) if course he used it anyways (... 🤦‍♂️) #kingwelle #vespa #tuning _____________________________________________________ DISCLAIMER: the information shown on this channel is my personal observation and opinion. It DOESNT automatically mean, that all parts by this producer/brand/seller do have or will have the same characteristics/issues. ________________________________________________________ -------------------------------------------------------------------------- FOLLOW me on insta: @FreakMoPed fb:   / freakmoped   --------------------------------------------------------------------