Challenging Winter Park No-Free Speech ordinance - Dr Pat explains

http://www.forerunner.com/blog/tosh-4... Dr. Pat McEwen explains to a freelance reporter what happened. The City of Winter Park passed an ordinance in August of 2012 that appears to ban residential picketing in the City of Winter Park. At the commission meeting, the Mayor Kenneth Bradley voted against the ordinance because he stated it was unconstitutional. Several attorneys attempted to enlighten the city commission regarding the errors in the ordinance. However, the city commission passed the new ordinance with one member, Tom McMacken, stating he did not care if it was unconstitutional. The ordinance was adopted in response to a residential "Awareness Campaign" last August by a group of Christian evangelists who wanted to distribute literature and march through a neighborhood where the president and CEO of an abortion clinic lives. http://www.youtube.com/embed/_3pAtCh_cz4 -- Larry Brown explains on 10/22/12 what the anti-picketing ordinance actually does and does not do in response to a prima facie challenge. When the ordinance was challenged in court as written, the Winter Park city attorney explained that "picketing" is very narrowly defined in the ordinance. He said that "picketing" may still allow marching and speech within the buffer zones created by the ordinance. However, the attorneys challenging the ordinance prima facie ("at face value") argued it is still confusing as written. There is a group of pro-life evangelists from the Orlando area that has been trying to seek clarification of what is allowed and is not allowed under the ordinance. http://www.youtube.com/embed/1VST1ONSguQ -- Here is a video of our first encounter with the police after the ordinance was enacted on April 13th, 2013. http://www.youtube.com/embed/FhGw3Js7os0 -- Dick Maxwell explains what we were trying to accomplish in the first challenge. Tosh 3.0 - 4/27/2013 -- http://www.youtube.com/embed/wp8B8fk2nEc Here the police explain that we can march back and forth in the buffer zone but cannot stand in the buffer zone even without signs. Still they repeatedly refuse to threaten us with arrest. This is in contradiction to what they told us two weeks before. This time they say we could march in the buffer zone. But this begs the question. If people don't have signs targeting a residence, how do they know whose property is the "buffer zone"?