RX 9070 XT vs RTX 5070: The inconvenient truth that changes your buying decision

The RX 9070 XT has undoubtedly been one of AMD's most important releases in recent years. Not because it's a perfect graphics card or because it excels in absolutely everything, but because for the first time in a long time it has put NVIDIA in an uncomfortable position within the segment where most gamers buy their cards: the mid-to-high-end 1440p market. In this video, we thoroughly analyze the RX 9070 XT, after several months of real-world use, to answer the question that really matters: 👉 Is it still a good purchase decision today, or is an RTX 5070 a better option? We're talking about a GPU that launched at around $600, with 16 GB of GDDR6 memory, a 256-bit bus, and a very clear focus on rasterization performance. In many games, the RX 9070 XT offers performance very close to—and even equivalent to—more expensive NVIDIA graphics cards, especially when ray tracing isn't the primary focus. This balance between price and performance breaks a long-standing trend: if you had this budget, the automatic recommendation was usually NVIDIA. Today, with the RX 9070 XT, that decision is no longer so simple. Throughout the video, we discuss real-world gaming performance, primarily at 1440p with high or ultra graphics settings, and also how the RX 9070 XT performs when upscaling to 4K, provided the graphics options are properly adjusted. We analyze its native performance, without constantly relying on upscaling or frame rate enhancements. We also delve into the areas where AMD still lags behind. In demanding ray tracing, NVIDIA maintains a clear advantage, both in performance and stability. Technologies like DLSS, Frame Generation, and the software ecosystem remain more mature on NVIDIA's side, which can be a decisive factor for certain user profiles. In this analysis, we contextually compare the RX 9070 XT against the RTX 5070, without resorting to a traditional "versus" comparison. We discuss key differences such as: GDDR6 vs. GDDR7 16 GB vs. 12 GB of VRAM 256-bit vs. 192-bit bus Approximate power consumption of 300W vs. 250W Differences in efficiency, technologies, and professional support All of this helps explain why the RX 9070 XT can offer between 10% and 20% more performance per dollar or euro compared to its direct NVIDIA competitors in rasterization, and why, even so, it's not a graphics card designed for everyone. If you use your PC solely for gaming, prioritize real-world FPS, play at 1440p, aren't obsessed with ray tracing, and are looking for the best value, the RX 9070 XT makes perfect sense. But if, in addition to gaming, you work with Blender, 3D rendering, artificial intelligence, advanced video editing, or rely heavily on technologies like DLSS and Frame Generation, NVIDIA remains a stronger option. This video isn't a brand war, nor a hype-driven review. It's an honest analysis designed to help you make a sound purchase decision, understanding the benefits and drawbacks of each option. 👇 Leave me a comment with: What GPU are you using? What resolution do you play at (1080p, 1440p, or 4K)? Do you prioritize rasterization, ray tracing, or price/performance ratio? Business and advertising inquiries: 📨 [email protected] Social media: Instagram:   / kuita_of   Facebook: https://www.facebook.com/profile.php?... TikTok:   / kuita_of