Part 1- 5: Panel Discussion Sri Lanka War - Press TV

PART 1/5: PANEL DISCUSSION ON SRI LANKA WAR BY PRESS TV Witness how a civilized society justifies terrorism. If civilized societies such as EU, (UK), USA, Norway, Canada Australia; support, defend and direct terrorists of another country, you cant blame innocent civilians being killed on the battle field. In this discussion pro-LTTE Member of European Parliament (7:35) Robert Evans (British) falsely claim Sri Lanka has a apartheid regime, Sinhalese discriminate Tamils. The truth is 'Apartheid' never existed in Sri Lanka. "Apartheid is an Afrikaans word literally meaning 'separateness', which was coined by the National Party when they came to power in 1948 to embody the complex social, economic, and political institution they created. Apartheid was a system of racial segregation based on the ideology later articulated as 'separate but equal'. The practical outcome of apartheid was the formalization of racial categorization of the population into 'White', 'Black', 'Colored', and 'Indian' races and the complete separation of social, economic, and political spheres for each of these groups" (White 2004). Participants: Lord. Naseby - Chairman Parliamentary group on Sri Lanka Mr. Douglas Wicrmaratne -Chairman Sinhala Association Mr. Surendran-British Tamil Forum Separatists Representative Mr. Robert Evans- Member of European Union Parliament (UK) Mr. Jeremy - Presenter Press TV ILL POLICIES ON GLOBAL CONFLICTS If so called "civilized societies" EU, (UK), USA, Norway, Canada Australia, protect & feed and defend terrorists of another country, you cant blame innocent civilians being killed on the battle field. Before you turn to others to blame, criticize your own policies on conflicts first and do not repeat same mistakes from one conflict to another. If USA did not support Talibans to fight Russia, Afghanistan could have been a peaceful country today. If USA could remove Sadam for dictatorial leadership then USA/EU should also be able to see LTTE dictatorship in the same perspective. LTTE killed Sri Lankan Tamils, Sinhalese, Muslims who disobeyed him, used civilians as human-shields, recruited child soldiers, used suicide bombers to kill innocent civilians in Sri Lanka. Civilized societies unable to understand the war in Sri Lankais. It is a separatist terrorism. They call LTTE terrorists as liberation fighters. Civil societies have an obligation to protect a civil society from a terrorist group. SRI LANKA WAR MY PERSPECTIVE I salute Lt. Gen. Fonseka, Commander of Sri Lanka Army for being honest and say correctly that solution to Sri Lanka war is a militarily solution (Part-2) . So called "sole representatives of minority Tamils" LTTE started ethnic cleansing of Sinhalese and Muslims in North and East of Sri Lanka. Innocent civilians were massacred by the most ruthless separatist terrorists LTTE for the last 26 years and General Fonseka was one of survivors of 200+ suicide attacks by LTTE against Sinahalese. Sinhala Only Act (1956) has been justified by S.W.R.D.B. why Sinhala as majoritys language (70%-Sinhala) should be the state language of Sri Lanka. Video SWRD    • Sinhala Only Act (1956) Justified by S.W.A...   EUROPEANS & TAMIL SEPARATISM: Why Europeans accuse Sinhalese and claim Sri Lanka has an Ethnic problem? Why Europeans support Elam cause? Are Tamil's allegations of (language) discrimination true/fair? Is Sri Lanka war an Ethnic or a Separatists Terrorism? European's Apartheid - Racial segregation/ Discrimination Racial segregation in South Africa began in colonial times under Dutch and British rule. When these Europeans invaded South Africa, they started discriminating majority native Black Africans. Native Black Africans were treated as second class citizens. White Europeans ruled the country. They segregated Whites from Blacks. For example; they reserved front seats of the bus for whites and rear seats for blacks, (see http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Aparthei... ) Tamil Separatists' Hypocrisy When Sri Lanka was under English invaders (1796-1948), Tamils didnt oppose having English as the state language (English less than 1% of total population in Sri Lanka). Surprisingly, when Sinhala became the state language in 1956 (70% of total population). Tamil claimed Sinhalese people discriminated Tamil people. The question arises here is why Tamils didnt (dont) claim they felt discriminated when another minority' language English became as the state language of Sri Lanka a century? EUROPEANS PERSPECTIVE ON SRI LANKA WAR Europeans having mastered APARTHEID-rule in Africa look at Sri Lanka in same perspective and support Tamils Eelam struggle; a separate Tamil sate (Two states option) to segregate Sinhalese like they did for native South African Blacks. EU wants to justify separatist terrorism through apartheid perspective! Solution to Sri Lanka war defeating terrorism restore democracy!. Absolutely, NO Eelam in Sri Lanka! ----------