The justified true belief is the most basic theory of knowledge and works in a lot of cases. Even though it's not explicitly said, it seems to be an underlying theme in all the other theories of knowledge, which just seem to parametise the justification and/or truth. It's as it sounds, a belief that is true that you have sufficient justification in believing The issues come from two areas, one can sometimes feel justified when they haven't really met their epistemic burden. The burden is greater than that of a mere belief because it also entails a truth claim. And there in lies the next problem. Truth. What is truth? Like knowledge, there are many theories of truth but the most common is the correspondence theory if truth. That which is in accordance with (or corresponds to) reality. There are issues with this, of course, as we only perceive a portion of reality, and if you go down a solipstic arc we're not even perceiving that. Pragmatically speaking, this theory is enough for most knowledge claims, but really could do with more rigor - that's where the other theories come in.