Woman Sues Romantic Rival for Attacking Her Car Over Prison Boyfriend! Part. 2

Faith Hamilton sues Sunshine Green for $2,600, alleging Green vandalized her car and defamed her by posting on Facebook that she was a wanted felon. Green countersues, claiming Hamilton filed false robbery charges and defamed her via messages. This fiery summary unravels jealousy, betrayal, and social media warfare in a New York courtroom. In 2023, Hamilton, recently divorced from Adale, met him to deliver belongings while he was a parole fugitive. Green, Adale’s girlfriend, allegedly chased Hamilton’s car, attempted to punch her window, and later vandalized her windshield and tires, costing $2,600. Green’s Facebook post falsely labeled Hamilton an accomplice to Adale’s crimes, prompting Hamilton’s protective order against Green, granted on May 9, 2024, after Green’s baseless robbery charges against Hamilton were dismissed. Green’s counterclaim alleges Hamilton’s private messages defamed her, but she presents a suspicious Facebook post from a “Faith D. Hamilton” account, which Hamilton denies owning, suggesting Green fabricated it. The central issue is whether Green owes $2,600 for vandalism and defamation, or if Hamilton’s actions support Green’s counterclaim. Hamilton offers a protective order, police reports, and Green’s post; Green provides questionable messages and a witness. The judge assesses credibility and evidence under New York’s preponderance standard. Courtroom drama exposes Green’s deceit. Hamilton’s protective order and Green’s post prove defamation, while police reports support vandalism. Green’s evasive responses and fake Facebook evidence—posted with high school photos Hamilton identifies as hers—undermine her counterclaim. Her witness fails to confirm public defamation. Key evidence includes the protective order, post, and reports versus Green’s dubious messages. In a civil case, the judge awards Hamilton $2,600, finding Green guilty of vandalism and defamation via the false felon post. Green’s counterclaim is dismissed; her robbery charges lacked merit, and her defamation evidence was private or fabricated. The judge criticizes Green’s dishonesty, noting her obsession with Hamilton drove her actions, likely fueled by Adale’s infidelity. The case reveals how romantic rivalries and lies can escalate into legal battles. Honest communication and accountability could have prevented this courtroom showdown. What’s your take? Was the judge’s ruling fair, or should Green’s counterclaim have held weight? #justice #drama #court #judge #judgejudy