செருப்படி வாங்கிய நீதிபதி | CJI Gavai Adv Kishore Shoe thrown at Supreme court Judge | Gods wish

An advocate named Rakesh Kishore threw a shoe at Chief Justice of India (CJI) B.R. Gavai on October 6, 2025, inside the Supreme Court of India. The incident was sparked by the CJI's remarks during a prior court hearing regarding a Hindu idol, which Kishore claimed was an "insult to Sanatan Dharma". Triggering incident The case: On September 16, a Public Interest Litigation (PIL) was filed seeking intervention to restore a beheaded idol of Lord Vishnu at the Khajuraho temple complex. CJI's remarks: The CJI reportedly dismissed the plea, commenting, "Go and ask the deity himself to do something". Backlash: The comment drew criticism on social media, with some accusing the CJI of disrespecting religious faith. While the CJI later clarified that he respects all religions and that his remarks were taken out of context, the backlash continued. Attacker's motive: During the shoe-throwing, Kishore, a 71-year-old lawyer, shouted, "India will not tolerate an insult to Sanatan Dharma". He later stated he was "deeply hurt" by the CJI's comment and had no regrets. The incident and immediate aftermath The attack: While the CJI was presiding over a hearing, Kishore removed his shoe and threw it toward the bench, though it fell short. CJI's composure: Justice Gavai remained calm and continued with the proceedings, reportedly telling staff and security to "just ignore it". Attacker released: Despite being detained and questioned by Delhi Police, Kishore was released after the CJI instructed the court registry not to press charges. Immediate action: The Bar Council of India immediately suspended Kishore from practicing law and revoked his Supreme Court Bar Association membership. Wider reactions and controversy Caste angle: The attack was seen by some as having a casteist dimension, noting that the CJI is India's second Dalit Chief Justice. Throwing a shoe is considered a deeply caste-coded insult. Government condemnation: Prime Minister Narendra Modi condemned the act, calling it "reprehensible" and spoke with the CJI to commend his composure. Online backlash and FIRs: The incident sparked an increase in online hate speech and abusive posts against the CJI, with some users creating AI-generated casteist content. This led to FIRs being registered in various states over the social media attacks. Criticism of law enforcement: The decision to not file an FIR against the attacker immediately drew criticism from some, including AIMIM chief Asaduddin Owaisi, who questioned the differential treatment based on the perpetrator's name and identity. Increased security: Following the incident, security was enhanced at the Supreme Court, particularly around the CJI's courtroom. Conclusion The issue around the CJI shoe throw involves a confluence of factors: a lawyer's extreme reaction to the CJI's perceived disrespect toward a religious symbol, political and social commentary on the judiciary's handling of religious matters, and intense scrutiny of caste dynamics in India. While the CJI showed magnanimity, the incident underscored deep-seated societal fault lines and raised significant questions about the security of judicial institutions and online hate campaigns. 00:00 Introduction 00:16 நடந்தது என்ன 05:13 கடவுளிடம் போய் கேள் 09:14 நீதிமன்ற அவமதிப்பு சட்டம் என்ன 12:41 செருப்படி வந்த வழி #CJI #BRGavai #SupremeCourtIndia #CourtroomDrama #LegalNews #IndianJudiciary #ShoeThrowIncident #KhajurahoTempleCase #PIL #CourtroomSecurity #JusticeGavai #LawAndOrder #DelhiPolice #BarCouncil #IndianLaw #JudicialConduct #CourtroomDisruption #CJIResponse #IndiaNews #LegalUpdate