Sony Kabushuki Kaisha v. Samrao Masker Case Explained By Vikas Sir.

Sony Kabushuki Kaisha v. Samrao Masker Case Explained By Vikas Sir.

Sony Kabushiki Kaisha v. Shamrao Maskar (AIR 1985 Bom 327) - Sony vs Nail Polish! Case Breakdown Discover this fascinating Bombay High Court clash on trademark reputation across unrelated goods! Japanese giant Sony (famous for electronics like TVs & transistors) opposed Shamrao Maskar's bid to register "SONY" for nail polish in Mumbai. Despite different products, Sony argued global fame + confusion risk under Section 11. But the court allowed registration—no evidence of actual deception between electronics buyers & beauty shoppers! Case Highlights:Facts: Sony's coined mark "SONY" (from Latin "sonus" = sound) world-famous; Maskar applied for nail polish (Class 3).Issue: Likelihood of confusion despite dissimilar goods/trade channels?Ruling: No overlap in customers or markets; registration OK as no proven deception!Crucial for #TrademarkLaw, #IPR & #LLB exams. Like, subscribe for more breakdowns! #SonyVsShamrao #AIR1985Bom327 #SonyTrademark #Section11Trademarks #BombayHighCourt #WellKnownMarks #IPRCaseLaw #TrademarkRefusal #UnrelatedGoods #LegalLecture #LawStudents #LLMNotes #IndianTrademarkAct #NailPolishTrademark